|
FOOD INTAKE AS RELATED TO FUNCTION AND ORAL ECOLOGY
Scientifically it has been proven that muscle and bone will develop to their limits provided
there is function. As an example, a child runs and plays to develop his or her muscles and bones to the
limits proportional for that individual. Controlling the child's environment as one does means that one
can control the growth and development of the muscles, bones and teeth in his jaws, as one can determine
what the child will receive in food intake. Utilization of coarse calories as soon as possible when the
teeth begin to erupt will result in the proper function of all structures in the oral cavity with normal
growth and development. Coarse calories mean such things as fresh fruits, vegetables, hard rolls, bread
sticks, and other hard, chewy foods. A survey was once done with fifty children, in which they were fed
an average meal: 50% of the children were given an orange cut into four pieces; the other 50% brushed their
teeth. Researchers discovered that the children who had eaten the orange had teeth 35% cleaner than those
who had used a toothbrush. Thus the indication is that there is less pollution to the oral ecology of the
mouth through the use of coarse calories rather than soft calories. As an observation: we all know children
have very poor manual dexterity, so coarse calories do a better job than a toothbrush.
In cultures such as the Eskimos, Australian aborigines, and Mexicans, they utilize practically
no liquid calories and hence begin vigorous chewing of coarse calories early in life. Consequently, they have
beautifully formed arches, beautiful teeth and bones. The Eskimo child chews before he has teeth. The black
man in the old South, with its poverty, is another example where there was little intake of liquid calories.
As a consequence he chewed very coarse calories and developed beautiful arches and teeth. Now that the black
man is in the white culture and is utilizing a lot of liquid calories as the white man odes, we are seeing
crooked teeth, flabby lips and soft faces, with decay.
Recent research on sectioning the jaws of infant children has revealed that they have chewing
pads before the teeth erupt, indicating infants are capable of chewing. The muscles, bones and teeth in the
jaws of our culture would also develop, but because of the prodigious intake of calories such as milk, fruit
juices and other semi-liquids, a child's lower face today never grows to its proper proportions because of a
lack of function; hence, crooked teeth, flabby lips and soft faces. The muscles, bones and teeth in not
functioning do not have good muscle tone. As an example, a child's arm when placed in a sling for three
months and not used will atrophy or "wither" from lack of function. Washing the arm three times a day will
keep it clean, but will not contribute to its development.
Medicine has done a complete turnaround on milk as a food, finding that it cause such things
as allergies, anemia (there is no iron in milk), constipation, and contributes to atherosclerosis. It is
also tied up with acne in the teens, as milk has a lot of hormones. Milk is a liquid calorie as well as
your fruit juices and therefore contributes not one bit to function of the bones, muscles and teeth.
What we are saying here is, for proper growth and development of the face, remove all milk
and all fruit juices from the child's eating habit patterns. Instead of giving the child some orange juice,
give the child an orange. In place of some apple juice, give him an apple, and the child can have all the
water he wants. There is no nutrition in water; consequently the child is hungry and will have to eat.
If you give the child liquid calories, this replaces coarse calories, and the child will not chew, as you
have killed his appetite. You also can't put 200 pounds into a 100-pound sack.
In our office we have a monkey whose name is "Rudy". We have had Rudy for the last year,
and a half. He came to us as a baby, with his baby, or "practice teeth", which he has since lost, and has
had his permanent teeth for some time. We control Rudy's environment - he receives no milk, fruit juices
or cereals (I wouldn't think of giving them to him). He receives water and coarse calories. Examination
of his mouth reveals beautiful, straight, clean teeth, no cavities, and beautiful gums. We all love Rudy
and Rudy loves us, and we wouldn't think of giving him something that would give him a problem. Our dogs
at home receive a fine brand of dog food (it is coarse) and all the water they want. They receive no milk
or fruit juice. Your dogs probably receive the same and as a result have beautiful teeth, will never need
an orthodontist, have no cavities, and their general health is probably excellent. If you can do this with
your dogs, why not your children? People feed their dogs objectively, their children by rote (habit) and
subjectively - in other words, not what is good for them, but what they like. Too many times people use
sugar and soft calories as an indication of their love, when a book, toy or something of that nature would
be much better for them. You wouldn't think of giving your child a knife or a gun to play with, as this is
too dramatic. Why give them sugar, which is not dramatic, but very insidious and can cause very serious problems
the child cannot understand. "Children are like golf and golf doesn't care who plays it."
|